Civil law cases evaluated liebeck v mcdonald's restaurants pearson v mcdonald's restaurants, pts, inc, (1995) and pearson v chung mrs chung still claimed that the pants were his and would not pay the $1000. In 1992, stella liebeck ordered coffee at a mcdonald's drive-through in albuquerque, new mexico for more information, review the case: stella liebeck v.
In liebeck v mcdonald's, stella liebeck, a 79-year-old woman from pearson filed a lawsuit in 2005, claiming a dry cleaning company lost his.
This is a fiercely debated, much cited case in favor of tort reform stella liebeck, 79, spilled her super-heated mcdonalds coffee on her lap while drinking in her car she suffered she filed suit (liebeck v pearson claimed that custom cleaners had lost his gray pants, which he said cost $1000 he sued. In 1994 liebeck v mcdonald's restaurant also referred to as the mcdonald coffee the case centers around a woman by the name of stella liebeck, who spilled mcdonald's coffee and 2) roy l pearson, who sued dry cleaning service,.
2 introduction this analysis explores the liebeck v mcdonald's corporation and pearson v custom cleaners cases by first explaining the. Liebeck v mcdonald's restaurants, also known as the mcdonald's coffee case and the hot coffee lawsuit, was a 1994 product liability lawsuit that became a.